Despite Some Perceptions, It’s Still Safe to Go to the Dentist


Dentists are still a simple target. From television and movies, to magazines and books, dentists are usually portrayed as either inherently sadistic or greedy and dishonest. Unfortunately, these dental accounts are usually stereotypically onesided and misrepresent the facts. Even though recently on the Oprah Winfrey Show, Frey was forced to admit to ‘mistakes and lies’, ” he didn’t back off from the’recollections’ of his dental experience. The cumulative result of the barrage of misinformation tooth pain is the fact that folks are able to become frightened of the dentist, and the dental treatment they need.

Even 30 years after the introduction, The Marathon Man still congers up fearful memories of Dustin Hoffman’s torture by Laurence Olivier, who plays an evil ex-Nazi who was a concentration camp dentist. Even though Hoffman knows nothing about the diamonds in the safe deposit box, Oliver viciously torments Hoffman by performing painful dental procedures without any anesthesia and asks him: Is it safe? How lots of people also reasoned that visiting the dentist had been’not safe’ then traumatic spectacle.

Ten years later, the 1986 version of Little Shop of Horrors had Steve Martin playing with the mean, motorcycle riding, nitric oxide inhaling dentist, Orin Scrivello. When Orin was young, he enjoyed doing cruel things to animals, therefore his mother thought he should seek out a profession in which his natural designs would pay off. From being a dentist, folks would actually pay him to cause pain, so that as an advantage, he’d also”get off” on their misery. Both these movies create after which reevaluate the notion which dentists cause annoyance, maybe not fix it, and that people are malicious opportunists.

It is an unfortunate truth that television has rarely shown dentists at a positive light in news, overall programming, or adverting. Unflattering sitcoms and commercials often utilize fear of the dental and dental hygiene within their scenarios. Even more upsetting is when a trusted news program delivers mis-information to its viewers. A case in point is the December 16, 1990 edition of 60 minutes. While I remind you of this title of this segment,’Can there be poison in the mouth area ?’ It’s possible to certainly tell the way that this’news’ application was moving.

The problem is’Can there be poison in the mouth area ‘ However, a few of its members say that there is certainly, and have stopped using it. ‘It’ is just a satisfying, a silver amalgam filling, the dental practitioners’ satisfying of choice for more than a century. More than a hundred thousand of them were placed to American mouths last year. What you most likely do not know is these alleged silver fillings are 50% mercury, and mercury is far more poisonous than lead or even arsenic.

Even though 60-minutes server Morely Safer acknowledges that’No particular disease has been directly associated with mercury from fillings,”?’ He goes on to indicate that mercury vapor has been connected to Alzheimer’s disease, Arthritis and Colitis, and that mercury in the workplace’has produced kidney damage, brain damage, birth defects, and indications of multiple sclerosis.’ Safer grills Dr. Simmons to the rest of the segment, and shows types of people have been miraculously cured when they had their amalgam fillings removed.

In another of several examples, Safer interviewed a woman who was treated of multiple sclerosis oneday later removing her amalgam fillings. Though I doubt that the trustworthiness of this account, let’s assume for a moment that the story was authentic. What if I told you that the purchase price of icecream and shark attacks were strongly connected? Whenever there is a large amount of icecream sales, shark strikes increased. Can the icecream sold to some young child in Montana cause a shark to strike a surfer in Hawaii? Certainly not, and the elimination of amalgam fillings failed to cure multiple sclerosis. Dentists, physicians, scientists, statisticians, and other informed individuals all know that correlation is not causation, but it can act as a clever trick in a scurrilous argument.

To say that this highly publicized incident was exceptionally reckless is an understatement. To strongly imply that amalgam fillings are both dangerous and their removal may cure diseases without a shred of proof is both dishonest and malicious.

A tiny proportion of the population is allergic to amalgam and there is also evidence that it might play a part in oral lichen planus, a generally benign and relatively uncommon disease. In my practiceI utilize enamel colored fillings called composite resin for the majority of my patients because I think it’s superior in a variety of ways, however I still use amalgam sometimes. Research in the April 2006 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association revealed that amalgam fillings had no detrimental effect on youngsters. In fact, I have amalgam fillings in my mouth, also may assure you that I sleep well at night.

The majority of folks will remember the content from the February 1997 edition of Readers Digest entitled’How honest are dental practitioners’, by William Ecenbarger. Ecenbarger travels the country with a set of his dental x-rays and has 50 unique dentists to assess his mouth. He shows that 12 of those 50 physicians wanted to accomplish a lot more treatment than he ever had, in accordance with a evaluation out of his family dentist and also a board of three other dentists that Ecenbarger trusted. Ecenbarger additionally highlights vastly various findings from many of the dentists from all over the country.

Although there’s probably some value in Ecenbarger’s slice, it’s great diminished by the hostile slant of the report. This is a normal excerpt from his expose:’I decided to get one extra exam. This one wouldn’t be from a dental practitioner in private practice but by a dental-school student whose principal impetus is to get it done right rather than to become rich’ It’s clear that Ecenbarger wants his readers to feel that most dentists are unethical and covetous, though his or her own experience demonstrated that just one out of 4 dentists he also desired wished to complete more treatment compared to their dentist along with his trusted panel had implied.

The publication’A Million Little Pieces’ written in 2003, reluctantly chronicles the adventures of self-described addict James Frey, the publication’s author. Frey’s account of his dental experience is full of inaccuracies as well as other highly dubious incidents. He composed he’d the agonizing experience of root canals and teeth capped minus the unwanted effects of local anesthesia. He compares the dental chair to a’medieval torture device’, also that calm descended on him that”the Condemned has to experience only before Execution.” Frey’s unrealistic portrayal of the dental trip is likely to cause irreparable anxiety and stress for all people who read his book. Those people who are or have been treated for drug dependence may wrongly think they can not receive local anesthesia and may avoid dental treatment. This can result in cracked teeth, gum disease, and painful dental infections.

I could think of no other occupation that has been demonized just as much because the dental profession. I’ve to see unwanted portrayals of Cardiologists, Podiatrists, Family doctors, Dermatologists, and on occasion even Proctologists–and trust I never shall. It seems that dentists will be the healers that we just like to despise. Although recently there have been some noteworthy exceptions such as ABC’s Extreme Makeovers as well as The View, every couple of years you can bet someone will probably soon be slamming dentists and the dental profession . Surveys reveal that nearly 50% of all Americans don’t seek regular dental hygiene. Have you got any idea why?